IntheWake

A Collective Manual-in-progress for Outliving Civilization

Index

Blog

Tools for Gridcrash

Search this site:

Succession of ecology,
success of revolution

Notes on ecological succession as a model for successful post-industrial community building

In ecology, "succession" is the term used to refer to the sequence of living creatures who appear on land that is new and empty of life, or that has been stripped of life for some reason (perhaps by a clear-cut). On a barren sand dune, for instance, hardy, drought tolerant grasses are the first to appear. [1] Over time, the grasses grow and die and add biomass to the sand. This organic matter in the sand helps to build soil that can retain water and nutrients. This allows the growth of less hardy, more specialized leafy plants, which continue building the soil at an accelerated rate. These plants give shelter for the seedlings of shrubs, and then trees, which grow up into a forest to provide shelter for a whole host of other inhabitants: animal, plant, and fungal. From the simple dune ecology based on grasses comes a complex and diverse ecology with many different creatures, species, niches and relationships.

I think that the example of ecological succession is profoundly relevant to our current situation. Civilization has been spreading across the globe for millennia, consuming the human and ecological communities in its path. It is like a raging global forest fire (which has burned up most of its fuel). It is an avalanche hurtling down a mountainside (and almost at the bottom). It is an exploding, erupting volcano (with the pressure of its subterranean source almost spent). Civilization has destroyed so many cultures, so many species, so much of the surface of the planet.

When it comes crashing down, inevitably, some time in the next couple of decades, we will be left with a world which has been clear-cut of life. The great Cedar forests of the Middle East have been cut, and replaced by deserts. [2] The massive herds of Buffalo that roamed the Great Plains have been killed, the grasses they once fed on are almost gone, and more of the prairie soil those grasses grew in blows away every year. The immense flocks of sky-darkening Passenger Pigeons are gone, as are the Chestnut groves that fed them. In the last fifty years alone the populations of ocean fish have been reduced by ninety percent. Who knows what more we'll lose (that is, what more will be destroyed) before energy shortages, ecological collapse and human resistance finally end this reign of destruction?

Our loses are cultural as well as ecological. Centuries of systematic genocide have resulted in the deaths of many tens (if not hundreds) of millions of indigenous people, and the corresponding losses, suppression and appropriation of their culture. Most of the more than 6500 languages in the world are on the verge of dying out and being replaced by English or other colonial languages as a result of this. And so we are left, for the most part, with a cultural wasteland in which the single most popular internet search is "Britney Spears." [3]

The cultural and ecological wasteland that we will be left with is not so different from the sand dunes of the succession example; we have lost so much of the forest-like diversity of the human and ecological world before civilization.

That's why I think we have some valuable lessons to learn from those hearty dune grasses. [4] The first species to arrive in succession are rugged generalists. They don't grow especially fast, or especially tall, or produce especially large fruit. (If they did grow especially tall without protection, the wind might blow them over, and if they grew large fruit it would be unprotected from the heat and sun and might dry out.) No, the time for these species has not yet come. The grasses can deal with a range of harsh weather and temperature extremes, because that's what you expect in the bare desert. But over time their actions will create a more stable, gentle environment in which a richer and more varied community will flourish.

These generalists are good at a lot of things; they're not specialists, just good enough to get by because that's what counts. They're very patient because they know that there's a lot of growing, healing and building of the soil that needs to happen. They have the fortitude and strength to make it through dry times. They spread bit-by-bit, setting their roots and bearing their seed.

These strong, patient, caring generalists are the sorts of people who I'm hoping to equip by writing In the Wake. None of the information here is the sort of stuff that would boggle the mind of a graduate student in Water Sanitation Systems Engineering, or Combustion Thermodynamics, but it's the basic information on water purification and cooking stoves (and so on) that people need - that they can learn quickly, remember, and pass on to other people to make real, concrete differences in a disaster situation.

And that's what I think is one of the most important priorities for industrial collapse. Not complex, hierarchical institutions of university-educated specialties that are dependant on sophisticated technology and industrial "renewables." Those arrangements are fragile and require the sort of stability that we are far from guaranteed in the coming years. [5] People experienced in such situations have noted, "Only simple arrangements are effective in emergencies." [6] That's why we need many, many small and tightly knit groups of people with some basic skills and tools, a flexible and adaptive spirit, a knowledge of how things came to be this way and a vision of how they want things to be. [7] People with a basic knowledge of first-aid, food growing and gathering, tool making, community building, and other simple skills that they can use and share. [8]

When I started reading about the great work that groups like HealthWrights have done with people with disabilities in the non-industrialized world, I was struck by how non-technical their work really was. [9] When they helped to create devices to give people greater independence and autonomy they didn't need advanced degrees in engineering, or precision-machined aluminum wheelchairs - to the contrary, precision industrial wheelchairs couldn't hold up to the rough terrain! The essence of their work, I saw, was simply caring, paying attention and listening to the needs of the people they were trying to help, and using basic carpentry and handicraft skills to make what was needed. I think that's an excellent example of the sort of "grasses" approach that I'm trying to describe.

I must admit that I very often worry about the darker times that may be ahead. Historical collapses have frequently involved varying degrees of violence between individuals and groups over resources as well as general displacement and deprivation. And to make the situation worse, the dominant culture has created a society of people who are isolated, alienated from each other (and themselves), fearful and paranoid, and generally lacking in strong family and community bonds and skills - the sorts of things that often help people get through hard times.

And with this, I can't help but think of the analogy of the sand dunes again. Like society at large, the dunes are made up of tiny, atomized particles that can move, slump and drift suddenly and unstably. When I think of collapse, I wonder: Will these sand dunes slide and swallow up the few oases of life and community that remain? Will rioting and brutal struggles over resources destroy even more?

Which is, of course, where the dune grasses come again. In nature, the intertwining roots of the grasses hold and stabilize the dunes.  In that same way these small, generalist groups - call them Collapse Co-operatives, or what you will - can reach out and provide knowledge and basic skills and tools for dealing with the situation. [10] And crucially, they can offer stabilizing confidence, a direction to go in, and a vision of how things could be.

No one knows for sure exactly how things will happen in the coming years, but there is much we can do about it. So let us gather our seed. Let us plant our grasses; let us begin succession in this desert that civilization has created. It's not going to be easy, but grasses lead to soil, and soil leads to shrubs; and some day the world will be forest, again.



[1] These first, rugged species are called "pioneer" species in the jargon of ecology; but I have to admit that the term has negative connotations for me, give the fact that historical European-derived "pioneer" settlers so often participated in the extermination of indigenous humans and the obliteration of indigenous ecologies. And yes, I know that a sand dune in a desert has its own rich ecology. For the purposes of this analogy I’m using a sand dune that has just emerged from the ocean, or been sterilized for some reason, and does not yet have life.

[2] They've not only been erased from Earth but erased from popular memory. Although Jesus, if he existed, would have walked in these forests, modern depictions show the events of his life taken place in a desert.

[3] See http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html. Yes, I know that civilizations have created their own cultural classics that are highly regarded by some. However, the stories and art of civilization are most often the stories and art of the rulers and the elite, justifying their systems of exploitation and glorifying their exploits. I don't value a culture of propaganda the way that I value cultures of freedom and resistance to that control. Those cultures of autonomy are the ones being destroyed. Moreover, the dominant culture has little relation to the world that most people live in - and especially the world that people will be living in post-collapse, and in that sense it is worse than useless. Indigenous cultures, in contrast, helped people to relate to and interact with the world around them in a meaningful way.

[4] Now, I'm not saying here that the indigenous peoples and intact ecologies that are left are irrelevant. Of course not! We should work with them to end the genocide and ecocide. But much of the world is like a desert in this sense, with indigenous ancestors and intact ecologies beyond memory.

[5] Not to mention that such arrangements are usually elitist and controlling, or that industrial "renewables" are mostly unfeasible for replacing industrial energy needs and are also flat-out unsustainable.

[6] United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Handbook for Emergencies, Second Edition, p. 160

[7] That's not to say such groups wouldn't utilize industrial technologies that they had access to - that's part of the "flexible and adaptive spirit." Those technologies just aren't an essential part of the strategy.

[8] Yes, in general the sorts of subjects covered in this book.

[9] See their website http://www.healthwrights.org/aboutus.htm, as well as books like Nothing About Us Without Us: Developing Innovative Technologies For, By and With Disabled Persons (www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/global/david/dwe001/dwe00101.htm), and Disabled Village Children: A guide for community health workers, rehabilitation workers, and families (www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/global/david/dwe002/dwe00201.htm).

[10] On a related note, see my essay on "The Cascading Refugee Effect."

Return to top

Want to reuse an article or how-to elsewhere?

 

 
This page last updated March 25, 2006 11:00 PM . Copyright 2003-2005 inthewake.org, redistribution for for-profit uses prohibited without permission. Webhosting by the Alpha Institute.