January 2006 Blog Archive
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
CNN
Money has an article reporting an effort to predict the impact
of various world events on oil prices:
Hermitage Capital's Bill Browder, has outlined
six scenarios that could take oil up to a downright terrifying
$262 a barrel. [...]
To come up with some likely scenarios in the
event of an international crisis, his team performed what's known
as a regression analysis, extrapolating the numbers from past
oil shocks and then using them to calculate what might happen
when the supply from an oil-producing country was cut off in six
different situations. The fall of the House of Saud seems the
most far-fetched of the six possibilities, and it's the one that
generates that $262 a barrel.
More realistic -- and therefore more chilling
-- would be the scenario where Iran declares an oil embargo a
la OPEC in 1973, which Browder thinks could cause oil to double
to $131 a barrel. Other outcomes include an embargo by Venezuelan
strongman Hugo Chavez ($111 a barrel), civil war in Nigeria ($98
a barrel), unrest and violence in Algeria ($79 a barrel) and major
attacks on infrastructure by the insurgency in Iraq ($88 a barrel).
Regressions analysis may be mathematical but
it's an art, not a science.
I think their numbers are misleadingly precise based on their
method of guessing. There is also a certain amount of fearmongering
going on, like in the opening line, "Be afraid. Be very afraid."
But it's still an interesting set of scenarios.
I think one of the reasons that kids are apparently getting dumber
(see post below) is
that so much of their time is taken up with school, TV, and video
games and diversions that inhibit their ability to creatively
play on their own and with other people.
To help encourage creative play, Toys
from Trash is a great site about improvising kids' toys from
things that would otherwise be thrown away. I think it's really
neat because projects like this require you to actually understand
how things work (instead of just snapping together a Lego set
that is designed to make only one thing).
Many of the projects hear are also fun for adults, and even help
build useful improvisation skills for a collapse context. For
example, the simple
handpump, simple
generator, and the button
wheel car. There aren't step-by-step instructions for every
toy, but making something based on an incomplete picture is also
a pretty handy ability.
One hundred and thirty years ago today the US government ordered
all Indians to be forcibly
moved to reservations.
Monday, January 30, 2006
Basic cognitive skills are on the decline according to a recent
study in the UK. This blows a "gaping hole" in the
commonly held idea that people in "developed" countries
are getting smarter and smarter, sometimes called the Flynn
effect. According to the article:
Far from getting cleverer, our 11-year-olds
are, in fact, less “intelligent” than their counterparts
of 30 years ago. Or so say a team who are among Britain’s
most respected education researchers.
After studying 25,000 children across both
state and private schools Philip Adey, a professor of education
at King’s College London confidently declares: “The
intelligence of 11-year-olds has fallen by three years’
worth in the past two decades.” [...]
In the easiest question, children are asked
to watch as water is poured up to the brim of a tall, thin container.
From there the water is tipped into a small fat glass. The tall
vessel is refilled. Do both beakers now hold the same amount of
water? “It’s frightening how many children now get
this simple question wrong,” says scientist Denise Ginsburg,
Shayer’s wife and another of the research team.
In other words, many of the questions in the study's test involve
the basic skills that would allow someone to, for example, improvise
a water pump out of available materials.
In 1976 a third of boys and a quarter of girls
scored highly in the tests overall; by 2004, the figures had plummeted
to just 6% of boys and 5% of girls. These children were on average
two to three years behind those who were tested in the mid-1990s.
“It is shocking,” says Adey. “The
general cognitive foundation of 11 and 12-year-olds has taken
a big dip. There has been a continuous decline in the last 30
years and it is carrying on now.” [...]
But what exactly is being lost? Is it really
general intelligence or simply a specific understanding of scientific
concepts such as volume and density? Both, say the researchers.
The tests reveal both general intelligence — “higher
level brain functions” — and a knowledge that is “the
bedrock of science and maths” says Ginsburg. In fact it’s
nothing less than the ability of children to handle new, difficult
ideas. [...]
Ginsburg says parents too can do their bit.
“When did children stop playing with mud, plasticine and
Meccano and start playing with Xboxes and computer games?”
she asks.
Children don't need to be taught basic facts about the
behaviour of the physical world as the article suggests. They
learn themselves when given the opportunity. When I interviewed
psychologist Chellis Glendinning she told me that the "human
psyche is ... built to mirror the environment. We were built to
mirror the sky, and the wind, and the seasons, and then to relate
to them in their language."
Our minds build a model of the world around us based on what
we perceive consciously and unconsciously. So if our experience
of the world is based on television or video games, we will expect
the world to follow those same rules. If we play an arcade game
then we learn that success is attained by performing rapid repetitive
actions to accumulate imaginary abstract points (like money!).
If we play a 3D shoot-em-up game we learn that progress is made
by moving along a set path in a world that gives the illusion
of having many choices, and by shooting any character we come
into conflict with along the way.
Thursday, January 26, 2006
I'm working on a few other projects, but I'll be back to regular
posting on Monday.
I didn't like a lot of the analogy in this recent article on
Live
Science, though unfortunately I don't have time to write about
that right now even though the subject is interesting. I think
that the monkey "police" sound more like discussion
group moderators than cops. Hopefully someone else will take this
and run with it:
New research reveals that monkey cops help
keep social groups in line.
Not having guns or nightsticks, they leverage
their group seniority, craft intimidating reputations and count
on good voter turnout.
Take the primate police out of a group, as
researchers did, and the rest get more violent and aggressive.
Interaction between cliques drops significantly.
"It's not just that violence goes up,
but a whole range of behavior involving a whole range of individuals
suddenly disappears," said David Krakauer of the Santa Fe
Institute. "It's like saying you take police out of human
society, and all of a sudden people stop going to the opera, or
something more important."
The study, detailed in today's issue of the
journal Nature, also uncovered a complex monkey "voting"
system for appointing the peacekeepers. [...]
Once elected, police monkeys earn certain rights
and responsibilities, one of which is to peacefully settles conflicts.
They usually do this by stepping between combatants or chasing
bad monkeys away. Very rarely do they need to dish out a whooping,
but their actions are always respected by the group.
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Via WorldChanging:
The SolarAid is a hearing aid designed and
built by Godisa Technologies, a Botswana company founded to make
low-cost hearing aids for the developing world. The SolarAid system
combines a small hearing aid and a lightweight solar charger;
Godisa developed the first No. 13 rechargeable button battery
for the system. Godisa is Africa's only hearing aid manufacturer,
and the only one in the world making hearing aids specifically
for the sub-Saharan Africa environment.
The SolarAid, including the solar charger and
an extra pair of batteries, sells for less than $100, and is built
to last at least two to three years. But, as low cost as that
is, Godisa wants to do even better: they want to make the design
free to everyone -- essentially, to go open source -- if the Botswana
government will let them.
Though large-scale industrial technology will never be sustainable
whatever good purpose it is used for, it's obvious that creative
folks can build a lot of adaptive technology for people with disabilities
based on the electronics that are already floating around and
readily available.
Monday, January 23, 2006
2005 was the hottest
year ever recorded in Australia. This comes with a history
of drought even under "normal" climate circumstances.
The high temperatures have caused a massive
spike in electrical consumption:
ENERGY usage in Victoria surged 45 per cent
above normal weekend levels yesterday, as air-conditioners were
switched on to cope with the heatwave.
Forecasts of more hot weather this week, and
power shortages yesterday in South Australia, have raised the
spectre of blackouts in Victoria. [...]
Searing temperatures in South Australia ...
caused widespread blackouts ...
And of course much of Australia's electricity comes from coal.
So climate change leads to increased energy consumption which
leads to more climate change and more consumption until it reaches
a breaking point, and collapses.
Sunday, January 22, 2006
Despite having vast oil supplies, Iraq has been unable to supply
its own gasoline and refined oil products due to refinery damage
(caused during the invasion) and persistent attacks on oil infrastructure
by insurgents. Iraq responded by importing gasoline and refined
oil. Now it owes more than a billion dollars and oil exporters
in Turkey have agreed to stop
sending refined oil products to Iraq. Demand for gas in Baghdad
recently increased by 30% because of the increased use of neighbourhood
generators. Constant attacks on electrical infrastructure and
limited availability of fuel for larger diesel generators means
that electricity
delivery in urban areas is unreliable and drastically reduced.
In Russia today a large oil pipeline
and two electrical cables were destroyed, apparently also
by "insurgents".
As Peak Oil progresses and oil becomes less available and more
expensive it will become increasingly attractive and effective
for "insurgents" of various stripes to target electrical
and oil infrastructure.
Some very creative folks have come up with a way to modify a
disposible camera to make an "RFID
Zapper" which will permanently disable RFID chips. They
write:
Why should I need such a thing?
We have to expect to be surrounded by RFID-Tags
almost everywhere within the near future, and they will serve
many different purposes. The benefits and risks of this technology
and it's use are already being discussed. However, there will
be atempts to use RFID-Tags to establish constant surveiliance
and to further threaten and compromise the privacy of customers
(and citizens and even non-citizens, when gouvernments start to
use RFID-Tags like the german gouvernment already did).
To defend yourself against such measures, you might want a small,
simple and relatively appealing gadget to permanently deactivate
RFID-Tags around you, e.g., to deactivate RFID-Tags in recently
bought clothes or books without damaging those.
Their complete plans aren't up yet but will be soon, apparently.
For more on RFIDs, see SpyChips.com
and the RFID article
from Wikipedia.
A couple of people reading my article Deconstructing
'Urban vs. Rural Sustainability' seemed to conclude that I'm
absolutely and universally opposed to living in cities or suburbs
during collapse. That's not the case. My concern was debunking
the idea that rural places were doomed to "blow away like
dust," not to say that all cities or suburbs are a horrible
place to be in collapse. I think that many of them will be, eventually,
but that isn't the point of this article. I actually do work to
create and maintain community gardens in cities and I think there
are definitely some compelling reasons to consider living in cities
and suburbs during collapse -- although many of my reasons for
doing so are somewhat different then Hemenway's. I'm working on
an essay now that will explore some of those reasons and look
at the urban/rural/wilderness continuum in a collapse context.
Satuday, January 21, 2006
About five
percent smaller according to Reuters.
Friday, January 20, 2006
The Globe
and Mail reports:
Suppose you could erase bad memories from your
mind. Suppose, as in a recent movie, your brain could be wiped
clean of sad and traumatic thoughts.
That is science fiction. But real-world scientists
are working on the next best thing. They have been testing a pill
that, when given after a traumatic event like rape, may make the
resulting memories less painful and intense.
Will it work? It is too soon to say. Still,
it is not far-fetched to think that this drug someday might be
passed out along with blankets and food at emergency shelters
after disasters like the tsunami or Hurricane Katrina.
I can't help but think that at best such a pill would be a band-aid
solution, and at worst an excuse to justify further trauma. It
also brings to mind the study of epigenetics
which suggests that the experiences of your ancestors will be
passed down to you via DNA for many generations -- regardless
of how many pills you take.
In the Wake contributor Bob writes:
Wow, I can't find any enthusiasm myself for
this "miracle drug/pill". My first thoughts were of
Aldous Huxley's Brave New World and the slogan "A gramme
is better than a damn" referring to the mantra that folks
should take they're allocation of Soma (drug) rather than be unhappy.
“SOMA - A drug that both tranquilizes
and intoxicates without hangovers or side effects. It provides
citizens of the Utopia with escape from self and surroundings.
The word comes from the Sanskrit language of ancient India. It
means both an intoxicating drink used in the old Vedic religious
rituals there and the plant from whose juice the drink was made-
a plant whose true identity we don't know.” From Barron's
Booknotes.
If this drug becomes a reality, then of course
it will make it much more acceptable to torture or abuse people
because “there’s a ready cure!” It’s for
this same reason that I hope medical science does not come up
with a cure for cancer; because if they do, then that’ll
give those in power the go-ahead to pollute even more excessively
than they do now – with no danger of causing deaths (for
rich humans anyway).
I can see this pill being carried by all “authorities”
(police, soldiers, judges, school principals, prison guards, etc.)
so that they can “erase” any negative effects of their
actions.
Sure, there will be some cases where people
are truly helped by this drug, but as Jerry Mander indicates in
“In the Absence of the Sacred - The Failure of Technology
and the Survival of the Indian Nations” (great book BTW):
a technology shouldn’t be evaluated solely on it’s
benefits, but rather on the balance between benefits and risk/costs,
and also on how much the technology benefits you relative to benefiting
others (especially your “enemies”). If you are benefit
a little while others benefit a lot means it’s a net loss
for you (from the competitive point of view).
Lierre Keith writes in a note related
to the critique of "Rural vs. Urban
Sustainability":
I kept thinking about my ex, D, whose family
had a small farm in the Virginia mountains. And the Depression
was a great big NOTHING for the area.
D's family raised dairy and beef cows, entirely on grass, no inputs
needed. They were fine during the Depression, as were their neighbors.
They had a creek, a smoke house, a cold cellar, fresh milk and
cheese and beef and eggs and fish plus vegetables, walnuts, apples...
But they didn't have a mortgage and owed nothing to any banks,
cash only for everything.
In this case the problem wasn't a distance from civilization.
Rather in other cases the problem was proximity to civilization,
and the accompanying dependence on the city (mortgages, and the
like) which caused problems for farmers.
Thursday, January 19, 2006
For one, I'm going to continue the question and answer series,
but I'm going to slow the pace slightly to three a week instead
of once a day so that I can continue them sustainably on my current
schedule. After I finish the first ten questions, I'm going to
go back and integrate the various reader comments I've gotten
into the answers. Then I'll continue with the series, but I'm
also working on:
- an analysis of the Urban-Rural-Wilderness continuum in a collapse
context that will build on recent urban vs. rural discussions;
- a multi-part series on making an Exit Plan from civilization;
- a discussion of some reasons why collapse may be very rapid
and severe in some places, rather than an entirely "slow
crash";
- and I'm also helping with an article written by other In the
Wake contributors that will discuss issues facing people with
disabilities in a collapse context.
In the Wake contributor Pig
Monkey has written in with some more questions for the Practical
Q&A series:
11) I'm not sure if this is more appropriate
for a q&a or a section of the booklet, but I'm curious to
hear your thoughts on post-collapse survival in a winter environment.
These days, we have fancy clothes, indoor heating, and what not.
We may perhaps venture outside for a short ski or somesuch, but
are nowhere near suited for long-term winter survival. I went
to a free Snow Camping 101 class today at my local REI that went
over the basics of making igloos, quinzhees, dugloos, and snow
caves, but I'd love to see more. Also inherit in winter survival
is, of course, producing and storing food.
11.5) Clothing, I think, is an important
part of this question. With our current mass produce, mass consume
society, even if collapse came tomorrow the survivors of our generation
and perhaps even the next would have enough "technical"
clothing to survive (assuming retail centers and factories didn't
implode), but this obviously isn't sustainable. Seven generations
from now, post-collapse children will still need to live through
harsh winter conditions. Hopefully by then, humanity will have
reclaimed the practice of growing cotton and weaving it into clothing
(something I know nothing about), but I can't see that being enough.
I'd
love to see a discussion of using animal skin, foliage, etc for
not only additional clothing layers, but for blankets and added
insulation in shelter walls.
12) What does Collapse hold for those of
us with prescription glasses? Stockpiling is of course a wise
idea, but not sustainable. Will those of us who rely on glasses
(or have any disabilities that require dependence on products
of civilization) be eventually wiped out? Collapse will favor
those without, but will it destroy us? Is this simply the sad
truth of "survival of the fittest"? (Do you believe
in survival of the fittest?)
13) This question leads into another --
do you think, post-collapse, we will form social groups or live
individually? Obviously having some sort of tribe to care for
the disabled and elderly would be a great help.
14) And now for a more broad, perhaps philosophical,
question: Do you trust emotion or reason for survival? Decisions
often have to be made in a fraction of a second, not leaving enough
time for much thought. Do you think one should trust the gut feeling
or what logic/preparedness/training tell us?
And on the winter skills subject, Pig Monkey notes that today
24 people
died of exposure in Russia as freezing winter temperatures plunged
to minus 30C (and that the temperatures are worsening the
energy crisis there).
A Korean government-backed agency is working on police and army
robots to be in action within 5 years, according to The
Korean Times:
By the 2010s, Korea is expecting to see robots
assisting police and the military, patrolling the neighborhoods
and going on recon missions on the battlefield. ...
"If the robots prove to be viable technically
and commercially, we will be able to begin developing them late
next year,'' said Lee Ho-gil, head of the center.
When completed, the outdoor security robots
will be able to make their night watch rounds and even chase criminals,
according to Lee.
The government also seeks to build combat robots.
They will take the shape of a dog or a horse, with six or eight
legs or wheels.
For a good analysis of the implications of this and similar technologies,
see the book Welcome to the Machine by
Derrick Jensen and George Draffan. (And on a related note, here
is an interview I did with George Draffan.)
In my recent article Deconstructing
"Rural vs. Urban Sustainability I made reference to people
moving into the country from the city during the Depression. Here
is the text for my source of that from William R. Catton's Overshoot:
The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change:
The fiscal collapse had an even more important
implication than this for our ecological understanding of the
human predicament. That implication appears in the generalized
Depression that followed. Consider the farm population in America.
Like almost everyone else, farm families were compelled, by the
repercussions of bank failures and the ramifications of general
panic, to cut their consumer expenditures. Farmers also often
had to allow their land, their buildings, and their equipment
to deteriorate for lack of money to pay for maintenance and repairs.
Many farms were encumbered by mortgages—mortgages which
were foreclosed by banks that now desperately needed the payments
farmers could not afford to make. (Bank failures were even more
common in rural regions than in major cities.) In spite of all
these difficulties, however, the farm population in America ceased
declining (as it had been doing) and increased between 1929 and
1933 by more than a million. The long-term trend of movement out
of farm niches and into urban niches was reversed during the Great
Depression.
Niches everywhere were being constricted by
the Depression. However, the urbanizing trend that had been occurring
as a result of industrial growth in the cities and from elimination
of farm niches by mechanization of agriculture was disrupted by
this economic breakdown. At the heart of the reversal was a simple
fact: the nature of' farming in the 1930s was still such that,
whatever else they had to give up, there was still truth in the
cliche that "the farm family can always eat." Other
(non-flood-producing) occupational groups that now had to fall
back (like the farmers) on carrying capacities of reduced scope
could find themselves in much more dire straits.
If we read it rightly, then, we can see the
differential impact of the Depression upon farm versus non-farm
populations as a cogent indicator of the dependence of the total
population on previously achieved enlargements of the scope of
application of' Liebig's law With breakdown of the mechanisms
of exchange, various segments of a modern nation had to revert
as best they could to living on carrying capacities again limited
by locally least abundant resources, rather than extended by access
to less scarce resources from elsewhere. Although scope reduction
hurt everyone, rural folk had local resources to fall back upon;
urban people, in contrast, had so detached themselves as to have
almost ceased to recognize the indispensability of those resources.
For reasons we shall examine in a moment, economic hard times
hit the farms sooner than they hit the cities, but in the final
scope-reducing crunch the farmers turned out to have an advantage
sufficient to interrupt a clear trend of urbanization.
You can read more of that same chapter here.
Related to the copper story from yesterday, it's worth noting
that there may only be 12-25
years of silver left based on current usage and extraction
patterns. Which is even less then oil. Silver is commonly used
in luxury applications, but is very important for the manufacture
of computer and other electronic devices. There is also a shortage
of tungsten
which is used to make incandescent lightbulb filaments (though
those are falling out of use anyway for fluorescents), but tungsten
also has various other industrial and aerospace applications.
It is true that many of these metals could be substituted for
in the event of shortages, but the substitutes would be imperfect
and cause additional strain on industrial civilization as it faces
declining energy supplies and increasingly ecological and climate
collapses.
When we are talking about shortages of metals, it's worth looking
at what people have predicted before about that (why they were
wrong or right), such as environmentalist
Paul Ehrlich's infamous bet with economist Julian Simon.
Wednesday, January 18, 2006
Kevin at Cryptogon points
us to this article
in Scientific American:
Copper is used in everything from automobiles
to ordnance. Copper allows electricity to be generated, transported
and conducted to the various outlets in a modern home. Copper
is also relatively scarce compared to other metals like iron or
aluminum that make up a good portion of the earth itself. So copper
serves as an excellent metallic bellwether for potential future
resource scarcity, according to a group of researchers who compiled
data on its extraction, use, recycling and discard to estimate
whether there is enough copper available to make a developed standard
of living available to all the world's people. The short answer
is: no.
I was actually surprised to learn that people in the US use 238
kilograms (525 pounds) per capita of copper.
After reading Q&A #1 Lierre Keith
(who I've interviewed before) writes
in to comment on teeth. She writes:
"As for dentistry, our collective teeth
problems are caused by agricultural foods and especially industrial
foods. Hunter-gatherers typically have long, strong bones, well-formed
faces and jaws, teeth that fit, and no tooth decay. The moment
people start doing agriculture, they shrink, their bones get brittle
and tooth decay becomes a fact of life. Enter industrial foods
(denatured grains, white sugar, vegetable oil) and you've got
epidemics of degenerative diseases and tooth decay. We all accept
it as normal because it's everywhere around us, but our real birthright
is perfect health. Another way to say this is, we have paleolithic
bodies but we feed them neolithic foods and expect them to function?
I've known people who switched from the typical American diet
(white sugar, white flour, polyunsaturated oil, factory-fed animal
products) to a diet based on traditional principles (raw animal
fats, lots of meat and bones from pasture-rasied animals, a diet
that's rich in minerals and the fats we need to absorb them) and
had their teeth remineralize! Cavities stopped decaying and sealed
over. So it can be done. Anyone whose intrigued should read Nutrition
and Physical Degeneration by Weston Price, or go to the website
http://www.westonaprice.org."
On the same theme, check out Jason
Godesky's related theses; civilization
makes us sick and collapse
increases quality of life.
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
Jason Godesky at The Anthropik
Network (which I recommended a few days ago) has
joined in on the urban vs. rural discussion today.
I've had a quadrupling of site traffic since the weekend and
a corresponding increase in email. I'm trying to catch up on it,
so please don't be offended if I don't respond right away. All
of the email has been constructive and thoughtful, so thank you.
This is the eight answer in the practical question and answer
series (see full set of questions
and the completed answers). If you have suggestions for answers
or questions please let me know.
Frank asks:
8) Condoms?
I have two answers. One is stock up while you can. However, latex
condoms expire, and petroleum based consumables are only going
to get harder to get, and eventually latex condoms will probably
be difficult to get. Latex production is certainly not sustainable,
though that obviously doesn't stop latex from being made now.
So the other answer is that you can make your own, but not out
of latex. Some of the first condoms were made (and some still
are made) out of animal intestines -- specifically sheep intestines.
Sheep intestines are just effective against pregnancy as latex
condoms. Unfortunately, the sheep intestines have tiny pores which
means that some small infectious organisms, especially viruses
like HIV, can move through. So sheep intestine is not sufficiently
effective against sexually transmitted infections (STIs). (Sources:
Association
of Reproductive Health Professionals condom page, Healthwise encyclopedia.)
(read the full post)
Monday, January 16, 2006
This is the seventh answer in the practical question and answer
series (see full set of questions
and the completed answers). If you have suggestions for answers
or questions please let me know.
Frank asks:
7) Pipe tobacco! And
Beer and Wine! What's life without some of the niceties?
I'll look briefly at tobacco, then discuss fermentation and distillation
of alcohol, various uses of alcohol, and other kinds of food fermentation.
To start with, tobacco is an easy one. Although it isn't an essential,
you can grow your own tobacco in most of North America. Plenty
of online sources offer information about growing tobacco at home
including the University
of Florida Extension Service.You can order seeds from companies
like Plantation
House and The
GreenWeb (though I'm not specifically recommending those sources)
but if you can find seed from someone in your area it will be
more suited to your climate and more likely to thrive. In general
I can't really recommend tobacco as a priority since it is generally
detrimental to your health, especially your lungs and teeth.
Wine and beer, and other alcohols, are actually quite easy to
make and the alcohol has applications beyond drinking.
(read the full post)
Radio4All is a grassroots
project to share radical and activist radio programs via the internet.
One of the shows I really like is Matt Soltys's "Healing
the Earth," which has some great audio interviews with
Derrick
Jensen, George
Draffan, Julian
Darley and many others.
Thanks, GP!
James Lovelock, originator of the "Gaia
Thesis," has a new book called "The
Revenge of Gaia:
The world has already passed the point
of no return for climate change, and civilisation
as we know it is now unlikely to survive, according to
James Lovelock, the scientist and green guru who conceived the
idea of Gaia - the Earth which keeps itself fit for life. [Emphasis
mine.] [...]
Over the coming decades soaring temperatures
will mean agriculture may become unviable over huge areas of the
world where people are already poor and hungry; water supplies
for millions or even billions may fail. Rising sea levels will
destroy substantial coastal areas in low-lying countries such
as Bangladesh, at the very moment when their populations are mushrooming.
Numberless environmental refugees will overwhelm the capacity
of any agency, or indeed any country, to cope, while modern urban
infrastructure will face devastation from powerful extreme weather
events, such as Hurricane Katrina which hit New Orleans last summer.
[...]
And in today's Independent he writes: "We
will do our best to survive, but sadly I cannot see the United
States or the emerging economies of China and India cutting back
in time, and they are the main source of [CO2] emissions. The
worst will happen ..."
It's pretty horrible to hear, but I think he may be right about
what will happen if fossil fuel burning continues unhalted. The
upside is that is enough people deliberately disable the fossil
fuel infrastructure in their region a runaway greenhouse effect
could still be avoided (although the window for that
may be less than ten years long).
Also from the article:
One of the most striking ideas in his book
is that of "a guidebook for global warming survivors"
aimed at the humans who would still be struggling to exist after
a total societal collapse.
Hey, that's a great idea! Like some kind of manual for outliving
civilization...
Saturday, January 14, 2006
[I'm posting this instead of a Q&A
today. The next Q&A will be on Monday.]
When Urban
vs. Rural Sustainability by Toby Hemenway started making the
rounds on the internet a year ago, I thought that the article
had a lot of shortcomings. But I was too busy illustrating Tools
for Gridcrash to craft a response. Now, after conferring with
a third generation organic family farmer for further insights
into rural life, I'm going to share some of my thoughts and responses.
--Aric McBay
Overall, the main point of Hemenway's article seems to be that
if a major industrial crash occurred "the cities may be unpleasant,"
but that "the countryside may be far worse off." I'm
certainly willing to engage in a discussion about that point,
but in this case I think that Hemenway's arguments are based on
a projection of his own personal and anecdotal experiences with
country living on society at large, and on some serious misconceptions
about the sustainability of the modern city. If his article was
only a series of anecdotes about his own experiences with living
in the country and the city, I wouldn't bother to respond to it.
But I feel obligated to because many people don't seem to be seriously
questioning the premises that lead him to suggest city in general
is a better place to be in a hard crash.
(read the full post)
Friday, January 13, 2006
This is the sixth answer in the practical question and answer
series (see full set of questions
and the completed answers). If you have suggestions for answers
or questions please let me know.
Frank asks:
6) How do I live if my work
skills are too specialised and high-tech dependent?
First of all, consider how your current skills and specialization
apply to a collapse context. If you are an electrical engineer
you can scavenge parts and build windmills, bicycle generators,
high-efficiency lights, and other tools that will be invaluable
to many communities. If you are a mechanic you can dismantle cars
and repurpose their components to make useful devices. If you
are a microbiologist you can focus on water filtration, building
the health of the soil and its organisms, and using bioremediation
to deal with toxins and polluted land. If you are a librarian
you can archive relevant information and books and make them accessible
for use in your community.
Once you've identified how current specialization applies you
can work on further developing those particular areas, by learning
more and practicing those skills. So if you know about electronics
in general, but don't know how to make a small low RPM generator,
learn now and practice.
However, it's still a good idea to diversify your skill set to
include skills like gardening, purifying
water, preserving and storing food,
building community, raising chickens, building
a composting toilet, cooking without
gas or electricity, making decisions as a group, foraging
for food, getting around without cars,
and first aid and wound care. Those kinds of non-industrial skills
are useful for everyone in a collapse context.
So build on your current specialized skills while developing
new and generalized ones. But remember that whatever skills you
learn should be part of the broader context of your community.
Look at the skills that the other people in your community have
and try to develop skills that are complementary to them.
From Mongabay.com:
About 300 million Chinese drink unsafe water
tainted by chemicals and other contaminants according to a new
report from the Chinese government. A leading government official
said the greatest non-drought threat to China's water resources,
is chemical pollutants and other harmful substances that contaminate
drinking supplies for 190 million people.
A recent nationwide survey found that about
90% of China's cities have polluted ground water, while millions
of rural Chinese face risks from naturally occurring contaminants
like arsenic and excess fluorine.
The report follows a massive chemical spill
in northeastern China which dumped 100 tons of benzene and other
carcinogenic chemicals into the Songhua River following an explosion
at a petrochemical plant. Initially local officials tried to cover
up the toxic spill which eventually forced shutoff of water in
the major city of Harbin and later flowed into Russian territory.
China's water problems are expected to worsen
in coming years...
From National
Geographic:
"Disease is the bullet killing frogs,
but climate change is pulling the trigger," said Pounds,
lead study author and resident scientist at Costa Rica's Monteverde
Cloud Forest Preserve.
"Global warming is wreaking havoc on amphibians
and will cause staggering losses of biodiversity if we don't do
something fast."
Thursday, January 12, 2006
This is the second part of the fifth answer in the question and
answer series (see full set of questions
and the completed answers). If you have suggestions for answers
or questions please let me know.
Frank asks:
5) How will I transport myself
if my car is toast because it's gas-based?
(...continued)
Wind powered transport:
In terms of efficiency of transport the sailboat can exceeds even
the bicycle, since in favourable winds the sailor requires only
a minimal effort to travel. Sailboats can also be made out of
available non-industrial materials (and also remnant resources)
as they have been for countless millennia. A modern fiberglass
or aluminum sailboat hull will also last for a long time, but
there are countless designs for sailboats you can build yourself.
See the links for homebuilt boats above, and also look at the
very simple Firebug sailboat.
(read the full post)
Hot on the heels of yesterday's text on transportation by foot,
Claude Duhamel writes in with a great suggestion I didn't mention:
barefooting. He points us to the Society for Barefoot
Living, which has an amazing number of articles on the subject.
I go barefoot in the woods whenever I can, and it's great. Even
in rather chilly weather a layer of reasonably dry leaves on the
forest floor can make your toes surprisingly warm.
There are times and places obviously when you wouldn't want to
or couldn't go barefoot. For example, if I was in an area where
where I thought certain parasites (like hookworm and schistosomiasis)
were present I would wear shoes since those parasites can enter
the human body through the soles of the feet.
The Anthropik Network is overflowing
with great essays and writings about civilization and collapse.
Jason Godesky has just posted a new essay there which supports
the basic premises of this project, that collapse
is inevitable -- and also that it has a very bright side:
In collapse, all the rules reverse themselves.
Sustainabilty becomes not only feasible, but advantageous. Small,
egalitarian groups out-compete large, hierarchical ones. Human
nature becomes adaptive, rather than something we must suppress.
That process is the inevitable end of any civilization, because
nothing can grow forever and without limit in a finite universe.
Moreover, that process will begin sooner, rather than later. It
has already begun, and in all likelihood, most of us alive today
will live to see its completion.
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
This is the fifth answer in the question and answer series (see full
set of questions and the completed answers). If you have suggestions
for answers or questions please let
me know.
Frank asks:
5) How will I transport myself
if my car is toast because it's gas-based?
We can look at various categories of transport based on the source
of energy. So let us look at combustion engines, human powered
transport, wind powered transport, non-human animal powered transport,
and electrical vehicles.
Combustion engines (Automobiles):
When I first started writing In the Wake I sketched out a short
list of criteria by which tools, technologies and approaches could
be judged to see if they were consistent with the goals of the
project. I wrote:
(read the full post)
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
I almost saved this for the Q&A
answer on medical supplies, but I decided to post it today instead:
[Researchers] selected three Labrador retrievers
and two Portuguese water dogs with no previous training, and over
several weeks trained them using breath samples that had been
exhaled into tubes by cancer patients. [...]
The dogs correctly detected 99% of the lung
cancer samples, and made a mistake with only 1% of the healthy
controls. With breast cancer, they correctly detected 88% of the
positive samples, and made a mistake on only 2% of the controls.
[source]
Bob Welsh writes in about his experiences with nonviolent communication
(see Q&A discussion below):
I'm certainly not an expert in this NVC field,
but I recently took a workshop series in "Compassionate Communication"
- taught by a certified trainer with the Center for Nonviolent
Communication (Marshall Rosenberg's org).
Info: http://www.empathy-conexus.com/
Resources: http://gorjohn.hypermart.net/resources.htm
There were a couple of encouraging aspects of this workshop that
I was
surprised and pleased to see:
-
Acknowledgement that non-violent communications may not address
all situations. It's totally appropriate to defend yourself
if you need to with methods outside the bounds of non-violent
communications. (I had personally addressed the trainer's
clarifications of the "boundaries" of NVC - i.e. where might
it not apply?). He was quite open to discussing this.
-
Acknowledgment that non-violent communication seeks to improve
the connection between (and respect for) people - not just
to "get what you want" or to "win an argument" via discussion.
-
Marshall Rosenberg specifically has had some good results
in dealing with very conflicted groups - such as a gathering
of members of two neighboring ethnic communities who have
actually killed members of each other's groups.
-
The individual "enlightenment" aspect of most modern "spiritual"
quests today has the individual seeking personal enlightenment,
but that is not enough; we as a people must figure out ways
(or relearn what we've forgotten) to get along with each other,
not just to enlighten ourselves and everything else be damned.
(Not news to me, but encouraging to hear this from the NVC
perspective - albeit heavily influenced by this specific trainer's
Rudolf Steiner background too).
I came away from this workshop with more tools
to address and defuse difficult situations in a nonviolent fashion
- but without having an absolute ban (as many pacifists would
argue) applied to violence of any sort (i.e. self-defense).
Monday, January 9, 2006
This is the fourth answer in the question and answer series (see full
set of questions and the completed answers). As always, if
you have suggestions for answers or questions please let
me know.
Frank asks:
4) How will I manage long-distance
communication?
As usual, I'll break this question down into several parts to
make it easier to deal with. So I'll look at methods of communication
based on radio, visual, auditory, and cable transmission, as well
as the physical movement of messages.
For various methods mentioned below a knowledge of Morse code is very handy.
(See this online applet which will translate text to Morse
code and even play it back to you as audio.)
Another useful skill is a working knowledge of cryptography so that you
can hide and encrypt messages that you do send. Even a simple
cipher, a method of rearranging
or substituting words or letters in a pre-arranged way that the
receiver understands, can make your communications less vulnerable
to evesdropping. Prearranged code words or signals can also help.
(read the full post)
Here is some more supplementary information for the issues discussion
in Q&A #3, security issues.
For resources on Nonviolent Communication, Sharai Mustatia seconds
the suggestion for the book Nonviolent Communication: A Language of
Compassion by Marshall B. Rosenberg. She also points us to
good resources at NonviolentCommunication.com.
Lastly, she recommends The Mediator's Handbook by Jennifer
E. Beer and Eileen Stief (developed by Friends Conflict Resolution
Programs). Sharai adds:
I use this book every time I am called upon
for conflict support and mediation. It is a very useful tool.
I have adapted some of the examples to suit less formal settings
for mediation. I also combine some of what is in the mediator's
handbook with some of what is in the NVC book.
Both books have proven to be invaluable to me. Especially since
I have been able to use them to build my reputation as a trustworthy
resource person during crisis or conflict.
And stuffit writes in to suggest these
resources from Seeds for Change on consensus-based decision making,
then notes:
My particular interest is that concensus is
all very well when there is plenty of time allocated to the process;
what happens when a group needs to make decisions fast?
One other model is the Zapatista method of organising - roles
within the group are rotated incredibly often, once a week.Whilst
initially being quite time consuming as people have to familiarise
new roles and experiences they are also claiming it is a wonderful
and practical way to teach people *real* politics. (see
related information
on the Zapatistas)
Another strategy comes from pirates of around the 17th Century,
since many historical pirate groups were much more revolutionary
than most people realise. On pirate ships it was a common practice
for the captain to be elected by direct democracy. Additionally,
in many cases the captain was only actually in command during
battle. The rest of the time the coordination of shipboard logistics
was coordinated by others (like the quartermaster) and the captain
did the same work as the rest of the crew. If, after a battle
or at any other point, the crew became disatisfied with their
captain they could simply recall their current captain and elect
a new one.
After existing for more than 400 million years, the coelacanth
has been pushed
to the brink of extinction in a matter of years by deep sea
trawlers.
Sunday, January 8, 2006
I had to spend much of today travelling, so today I'm going to
supplement some of my previous answers from the Q&A series and post the next full answer tomorrow.
In Q&A #1 (toothpastes and
powders, soaps and shampoos, and razors) I posted a link to a
recipe for making soap using soapwort. However, MM reports that
soapwort plants have become quite rare in the wild. So unless
you have a supply of soapwort that does not deplete the wild population,
please try to use other recipes for soap.
I also mentioned originally making stick toothbrushes or "chew
sticks" out of pencil-sized twigs from trees like cedar with anti-septic
properties. It turns out that Oak and Sassafras have also been
commonly used to make chew sticks historically.
In addition, I came across a recipe for toothpaste which requires
no baking soda or glycerine, and was apparently used by some indigenous
people in north america. The recipe is simple: combine the powdered
new bark of an oak (especially black oak, Quercus velutina) with
the bark of a black alder (Alnus glutinosa) and add bayberry (Myrica
pensylvanica) and wild ginger (Asarum canadense) to form a paste,
and use as usual.
Lastly, I want to note that as the intake of sugary, processed
foods decreases people in general will probably have fewer problems
with tooth decay and cavities so long as they practice basic dental
hygiene.
I've also started to get some suggestions for Q&A
#3 (Security issues), which I'll post tomorrow.
Thanks to everyone who sent in their thoughts and suggestions,
more input is always welcome.
Saturday, January 7, 2006
This is the third answer in the question and answer series (see full
set of questions and the completed answers). If you have suggestions
for answers or questions, please let me know.
Frank asks:
3) How do I protect them
from the unprepared and desperate have-nots if I don't already
have a fort-knox style bunker? (Security issues)
This is a really big issue, and I'm going to post this answer
as a rough starting point to encourage discussion, and then edit
and expand it significantly based on some of the further contributions
and comments I get. It is also a subject that people are often
uncomfortable or afraid to talk about, perhaps partly because
of worries about sounding like or being associated with "survivalist
right-wing gun-nut" types. But it's very important to talk about
simply because security
is one of the scariest issues around collapse, and we aren't going
to get anywhere by avoiding unpleasant topics of conversation.
When talking about security in a collapse context we have to look
a continuum of possible aggressors. Some of them may indeed be
the unprepared and unorganized people that you mention in your
question. There will also be mid-level organized aggressors like
gangs, organized crime, or similar groups of people who band together
for self-defense and to take from the wider community. The most
organized group will be corporations, governments, and pseudogovernments,
which claim to be entitled to commandeer and appropriate
just about anything, even continents.
(read the full post)
Thursday, January 5, 2006
Here is the second answer in the question and answer series (see
the completed answers at inthewake.org/questions.html).
If you have suggestions for answers or questions, please let me know.
There will be no answer tomorrow (Friday) because I have a bunch
of garden planning and seed-organizing to do. The next one will
be posted on Saturday.
Frank asks:
2) How do I get access to hard-to-find
objects, materials and ingredients? (i.e., saffron, oranges, pipe-tobacco,
light bulbs, batteries, electronic parts, solar panel parts, ammunition
for guns. Basically, anything that still requires industrial techniques.)
I'm going to answer this question in two parts. Firstly, since
there is definitely too much instructional material required cover
each item individually, but I'll look the items in terms of several
categories. And then secondly I'll suggest a number of strategies
that you can adopt for dealing with those possible shortages.
So let me break down some items into different categories.
(read the full post)
Wednesday, January 4, 2006
The Guardian reports:
The oceans are emptying. In a single generation,
once thriving populations of deep sea fish have been driven to
the brink of extinction by expanding fisheries, researchers say
today. [...]
"We expected to see declines, but we didn't
expect such severe declines," said Jennifer Devine, a PhD student
who led the study at Memorial University in Newfoundland, Canada.
"If nothing changes, we could be facing barren oceans ..." [...]
The scientists reviewed trawler logs for records
of five deep sea by-catch species - the roundnose grenadier, onion-eye
grenadier, blue hake, spiny eel and spinytail skate. All are slow
growing, reaching more than a metre long and living to 60 years.
They found that levels of all the fish plummeted by 87%-98% over
the 17 years, a rate that will see a decline over the next three
generations of 99%-100%. Records for roundnose grenadier and onion-eye
grenadier from 1995 to 2003 show those species have collapsed
by 99.6% and 93.3% in 26 years.
The upside is that with any luck a reduced availability of oil
and the eventually collapse of the industrial infrastructure may
prevent many species from becoming completely extinct.
Here is the first answer in the question and answer series I
mentioned earlier today. All of the completed answers will be
posted at inthewake.org/questions.html. If you have suggestions
for answers or questions, please let me know.
Frank asks:
1) What do I do for toothpaste?
I don't know how to make it. Shampoo? Glycerine soap? Goodness--razors!
Toothpaste (and more):
Basic dental care (including brushing) is an extremely important
preventative health measure. This is especially the case if your
access to professional dental care might be limited. Toothpaste
in particular is important because makes brushing more effective
and more pleasurable.
A basic toothpaste can be made by combining baking soda, flavourings (like essential oils or herbs),
glycerine and salt.
Baking soda and salt are very mild abrasives and will help remove
the plaque and bits of food on your teeth and around your gums
that would contribute to decay, irritation and cavities. Some
recipes use clay powder for this purpose. Historically all kinds
of abrasives have been used, including pulverised brick and crushed
sand (which are probably too
abrasive).
(read the full post)
In the Wake reader Frank
has written in with a set of questions he has about how to deal
with problems in day-to-day living during collapse. I'll be responding
to his questions one by one in a series over the next week and
a bit:
1) What do I do
for toothpaste? I don't know how to make it. Shampoo? Glycerine
soap? Goodness--razors!
2) How do I get access to hard-to-find objects, materials and
ingredients?
3) How do I protect them from the unprepared and desperate
have-nots if I don't already have a fort-knox style bunker? (Security
issues)
4) How will I manage long-distance communication?
5) How will I transport myself if my car is toast because it's
gas-based?
6) How do I live if my work skills are too specialised and high-tech
dependent?
7) Pipe tobacco! And Beer and Wine! What's life without
some of the niceties?
8) Condoms?
9) Whoops. Medical supplies.
10) A good library will be indispensable too. Can you do dentistry,
remove an appendix, midwife or care for the dead?
If you have suggestions for answers to these questions, or if
you have questions yourself, please email me.
Tuesday, January 3, 2006
Last week a price dispute between Russia and Ukraine caused
significant reductions in the supply of natural gas to
countries in Europe which recieve gas via Ukraine, including
Serbia, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Slovakia, France, Italy and
Germany (source).
Now Russia has said it will stop selling the Ukraine natural
gas altogether, which
does not look promising.
Ukrainian
officials have said they have enough gas reserves to ease the
impact of the crisis on household consumers through the winter.
However, experts believe a shutdown could devastate Ukraine's
natural gas-reliant metals and chemicals industries in a matter
of days if no resolution is reached.
The dispute has caused an increase
in oil prices.
The Scotsman reports:
AT LEAST five people were killed and ten
more were feared trapped last night after the roof of a skating
rink in the Bavarian Alps collapsed after heavy snowfall, as
extreme weather around the world marked the first days of 2006.
[...]
Snowslides have killed seven people in the
French Alps in the past few days.
Meanwhile, excessive heat has caused wildfires
across the US prairie states of Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico.
In Texas yesterday, scores of homes were destroyed and two small
towns burned to the ground.
Other fires across the drought-stricken region
burned thousands of acres in Oklahoma and New Mexico, forcing
hundreds of people to be evacuated. Officials warned that the
dry, windy weather and extreme fire danger would continue. [...]
Asia also suffered badly from the climatic
extremes. In central Indonesia, flash floods swept away hundreds
of houses and schools early yesterday, killing at least 34 people.
Villages were inundated when overnight rains
triggered a landslide on a hill in Panti, a sub-district of
the East Java province, causing a river to break its banks.
Many people sought shelter from the surging waters in mosques
and boarding schools. "So far 34 people have been confirmed
dead," said Burhanudin, an official in Panti. "At least 30 others
have been injured."
In Pakistan, heavy snow and rain brought
more misery to Kashmiri earthquake survivors, halting relief
work, bringing landslides down on roads and flooding tents.
The Guardian reports:
Modified genes from crops in a GM crop trial
have transferred into local wild plants, creating a form of
herbicide-resistant "superweed", the Guardian can reveal.
The cross-fertilisation between GM oilseed
rape, a brassica, and a distantly related plant, charlock, had
been discounted as virtually impossible by scientists with the
environment department. It was found during a follow up to the
government's three-year trials of GM crops which ended two years
ago.
The new form of charlock was growing among
many others in a field which had been used to grow GM rape.
When scientists treated it with lethal herbicide it showed no
ill-effects.
Unlike the results of the original trials,
which were the subject of large-scale press briefings from scientists,
the discovery of hybrid plants that could cause a serious problem
to farmers has not been announced.
The scientists also collected seeds from
other weeds in the oilseed rape field and grew them in the laboratory.
They found that two - both wild turnips - were herbicide resistant.
This is exactly the sort of thing that anti-GMO activists have
been warning about for a long time, and it is completely predictable.
The main question for me is what the exact result will be.
In an ideal world, more and more farmers will see the light
and shift to more organic methods. But I think what we will
actually see as "superweeds" start to spread is that companies
like Monsanto (which owns the patents to pesticide resistant
food crops and manufactures the pesticides used on them) will
simply use this occurance to their advantage, and start selling
new and more toxic pesticides to try to kill the superweeds.
|